There is God….and then there is Sachin!!

My cup is full…no, no, it is running over! I have been lucky to see one of the finest symphonies ever to have been played on the cricket field. Tendulkar’s unbeaten double ton last night was not merely an incredible achievement being first ever in 39 years and 2961 ODIs played so far, but a real master class. The control with which he coaxed the ball in to the gaps was really seen to be believed. No words can describe the beauty of it. More than the milestone, I was awe-struck by sheer control, incredible placement and almost no violence in scoring at a break-neck speed. There are players who can bludgeon the ball (as Dhoni last night), or dominate the scene completely (a la Viv Richards’ unbeaten 189 at Old Trafford in 1984), or manufacture shots to befuddle the bowlers like Sehwag usually does, but only Tendulkar in the mood he was in yesterday, could have made bowlers and fielders feel totally helpless and still enjoy the spectacle. Even agreeing that the conditions were perfect for batting, the opponent was far from toothless. A look at his batting chart will reveal that he played strokes all round. What it will not reveal is how he evaded fielders specifically placed to stop his shots. The performance was so commanding that it was like a maestro playing a club side; just that the bowling attack he shred to pieces is one of the best in the business today.

It was obvious that the bowlers could do little to stop him. Indeed the only lip any bowler could have given him was for running on the pitch like Dayle Steyn probably tried to; basically every thing the poor fellow tried had failed to disturb Tendulkar’s concentration and incandescent stroke play. When 145 km fast swinging yorkers outside the off stump are perfectly placed into midwicket gap to find the fence, and that too without violence, the bowler can only sigh. All pace bowlers, champions or otherwise, go through various steps of emotional expressions when they are bowling; a taunting smile, in-your-face frightening stare, a snarl, a tantrum, an ugly remark, kicking the invisible grass, pulling own hairs, shouting nasties at his own fielders, luck and even umpires. What I saw yesterday on the faces of Steyn and all SA bowlers was sheer tranquillity with a sense of inevitability after being dispatched to the fence. It was as if they were saying “Oh well, let us try again and hope that he gets tired or bored and gives his wicket away”. It was not helplessness; it was almost as if they were in a trance, having reached a state of Nirvana; an acceptance beyond pain. It was as if after midway through his innings, every ball bowled to Tendulkar was a “Prasad”, an offering to the God with sincere prayer that he will accept and make you a part of Himself…the innings was simply beyond all adjectives; in fact a new adjective “Tendulkar 200” would be an epitome of adjectives describing sheer beauty of batting..to me at least.

Now to the record part. There are quite a few batsmen I can think of, who deserved the record of scoring first ever double ton in an ODI, but Tendulkar gave it a credibility it deserves. Just as Robin Jackman commented on air before Tendulkar crossed 194, that he had nothing against Charles Coventry of Zimbabwe being at the top of the tree in individual score list in ODI (did you know that??), but somehow Tendulkar’s name at the top makes more sense. Usually awards make recipients more creditable; however there are some people who make an award more creditable. e.g. a Nobel Peace Prize is poorer for not having Mahatma Gandhi on its roster. Batting record for highest ODI individual score was the same without Sachin’s name on it. As the legendary cricket record breaker of all times, Sunny Gavaskar (in late 80s, an Indian author actually published a small book on Gavaskar’s records!), used to say that all cricket records are meant to be broken. And this one shall be broken too…in due course. Hard to say when though, since this one took some time. But that will never diminish the lustre of this innings. After having been written off a few times in his career, the maestro showed to every one what he has evolved into. To bat through 50 overs after playing international cricket for 20 years at an “old” age of 36 (in cricketing sense) he was answering not only his detractors but also setting a bar for his much younger colleagues. I don’t envy the young wannabe Sachins, nor his detractors who do not have a place to hide today..

The man is a genius, no one doubts that. What majority of fans miss is what goes on in that brain. He still possess that almost boyish love for the game. His passion still reminds me of that same baby-faced 14 year old I saw for the first time on Motibaug ground, Baroda (in 1987?) when he came with the Bombay team. We knew he was not going to make his debut; so we all went previous evening to see him bat in the nets. I remembered the same Sachin yesterday; same passion and love for the game, same hunger for runs. Age may have mellowed his swashbuckling style (ask Abdul Kadir who was carted for 3 sixes in an over even before Sachin had played any international game or Shane Warne of the 1997 “nightmares of Sachin coming at me”); but that is precisely where his his mastery lies..in not continuing a mono-dimensional approach to his game. His greatness is in his ability to adept his game to his advancing age. Here is a man who exactly knows how to maximise his talents under any adversity. I have seen many batsmen loosing their ability either due to age or psychological scars (like Krishnamachari Srikanth). What Tendulkar has displayed that needs to be understood and revered by every cricket fan, is his vice-like mind control. He has evolved a batting style that marries his body’s increasing limitations, his soul’s need (hunger for runs) and his team’s success. That is the work of a master!

Another thing. I have a feeling that this symphony that we call Sachin is reaching a crescendo. His last 10 international centuries have come in 33 innings in last 12 months. It is almost as if he has picked up furious pace as he is approaching final destination; may be that will come at World Cup 2011 on the sub-continent. He seems to be focussed upon making the most of the available period before calling it quits. Mark my words folks, we are in for a treat! I still feel he will continue in Test cricket beyond 2011, till he sees new crop of Indian batsmen adjust internationally to help India maintain the top rank achieved after so much effort. I really believe he is that type of a player; a total team man for whom the team’s success means more than his own. My suggestion is don’t miss to watch the maestro every time you have an opportunity..or else “धुन्ध्ते रह जाओगे”  (for those who do not know Hindi: “you will keep searching for him”). Go Sachin, you little beauty!!

Is test cricket at night more sexy?

Had India failed to win today’s test, there could have been numerous Indian journos asking why BCCI refuses to play test cricket under flood-lights. Well, there is some merit in that argument; Indians lost close to 55 overs yesterday due to bad light/rain and if flood lights were permitted, they could have put in some overs out of that. They came close to loosing an opportunity to square the series and stay on top of the ICC ranking. For now, at least, calls for BCCI to join in an attempt to search for flood-light solution to test cricket may not rise. Of all boards, BCCI has been talked about as an autocratic board which does not hesitate to milk Indian cricketers as cash-cows. But they some how are not falling in with other cricket boards on this issue. Call BCCI traditionalist or just bullish for not joining other cricket boards, especially two powerful lobbies in world cricket namely Cricket Australia and ECB who are very keen to play test cricket under flood-lights as early as within next two years. I don’t know why; but I don’t mind that decision. I am not arguing this only on emotion that test cricket should remain traditional. Do we really need test cricket to be played at night, is my question.

Apparently it is argued that revenue from audience attendance for test cricket is diminishing and something needs to be done to attract the crowds back. Many administrators of the game seem to think that making test cricket a day-night affair will achieve that. They are convinced that this is the only way test cricket will survive. I am not sure about that. I believe economics of the game of cricket is based upon TV revenue more than audience attendance in stadium. It is a fact that any test series will make money if it is sufficiently attractive for subcontinent fans. More than 70% revenue from TV rights for any test series is generated by Indian corporates. Crowd attendance is hardly important. Now with ICC getting its fair share of cut from every TV deal and then sharing that revenue with ALL member associations, Indian corporates have become cash-cows for all cricket boards in the world. If there is sufficient interest on the sub-continent in a test series between any two nations, it will become a profitable proposition regardless of the number of spectators. I do not like that situation, but that is reality. And looking at some closely contested test series in recent times (Ashes in England, SA-Eng in SA, India-Australia, India-England and even India-NZ in NZ), audience have returned to test cricket, at least TV audience if not as much, at the venues. I believe that any series involving India, Australia, SA, England and Pakistan will make money regardless of number of spectators at the venue. Test cricket is alive and kicking; there could not have been a better example of that than today..

However, the powers that be, are convinced that night cricket is the only way forward for test cricket to survive. As you know, white, red, pink, fluoro lime are a few colours  that have been trialled unsuccessfully. This season Cricket Australia trialled a pink ball in some representative games (Inter-state second eleven games). The results were hardly encouraging. The ball lost visibility after ~50 overs due to loss of colour. White ball which is used for ODIs have the same problem. Hence they introduced new rule recently to change the ball from 35th over every game. In test cricket ball is changed only after 80 overs unless it looses shape or is artificially damaged, a la Shahid Afridi. Which means, at some stage if someone comes up with a  night-friendly and long lasting coloured ball, we may see advent of test cricket under flood lights. I am not comfortable with that argument; one reason being, as mentioned above, there is no economic reason to do so.

While I am not necessarily a traditionalist, I would still like to see test cricket being maintained as it is now. I love every new innovation introduced in cricket, like coloured balls and clothing and night ODIs and T20s. But test cricket is a pinnacle of skill and temperament of a player. It separates men from boys. It needs to be kept in its pure form.

There is also another reason in my opinion, to maintain test cricket as such. Every human being has a biological clock within. You normally perform best at a certain time of the day and start loosing physical and mental power as night approaches. I think it would be very difficult to play test cricket under conditions when adrenalin starts to wane and body starts to loose its optimum power, concentration starts flagging. Granted that all international players are now used to maintain optimal level of concentration while playing day-night cricket, I am not convinced that they will be able to maintain peak performance for FIVE DAYS continuously in a test match.

Additionally, drastic variation in playing temperatures from day (35°C) to night (20°C) can cause serious muscle/tendon injuries e.g. If a pace bowler has to start bowling at 9 pm after his batting is done, he may struggle to warm up the body sufficiently to be able to bowl at 150k without damaging muscles/tendons. It may be done after sufficient training regimes are devised, but I suspect the risk of injuries will be lot higher than at temperatures that do not vary significantly, especially when one has to exert for five consecutive days.

One critical aspect of any competition is that the condition should remain relatively similar for both sides. I know conditions change from session to session in test cricket and champion sides learn to conquer that. However, if gripping the ball becomes an issue, I believe that is a significant and unfair change to the playing condition, that actually makes one side less competitive than the other. I am referring to a critical factor that will be encountered in night cricket; dew. Recently we have seen that the dew made ball very wet at night resulting in sides choosing to bowl first under day light even after winning the toss on a flat track.

Test cricket is the ultimate test of a player and a team’s capabilities, skills and attitude; physical and mental. Conditions must be perfect for such an encounter. I believe night cricket will change that significantly so that environmental conditions will become more important than skill. As the late Vijay Merchant would say, that my dear sir, is not cricket.

Care to share your Late Cuts?

L"axeman" Does it again..

Another symphony from Motzart of Cricket, Lax, the Axeman. And what a contrasting day of cricket it was yesterday. Even if you may not have watched it, I am sure you can imagine Laxman and Dhoni sharing a long pertnership (I think this is their first century partnership). Laxman’s silken touch sending the cricket ball to the fence without apparent power intersperced with Dhoni’s violent treatment, was like listening to a Ghazal and a Bhangra at the same time. I love melody and rythem both equally and it was fantastic to watch. So where is this test and India’s tenuous hold on the top ranking in the ICC test championship headed? I reckon, Indians will be able to force a decision in their favour even though the wicket looks nice to bat on. I believe you need to give lots of rotation to the ball on this wicket to create an impact; Bhajji and Mishra should be able to do so and with a lead of 347, put Proteas under pressure and share the series. At worst, Indians will be chasing ~50 in fourth innings.

Also, good to see Yusuf Pathan come into the ODI team. He seems to be in great form; remains to be seen if he can stand up to the pressure of playing against probably the best bowling side in the world, with the same confidence he takes into a Ranji game. I reckon he can. He seems to be that ever-elusive all -rounder, “poor-man’s Kapil” that his younger sibling gave me a glimps of being, at the start of his career in 2004. All those who listened to me know how certain I was about Irfan Pathan becoming that important all-rounder Indian test team so desperately needs. While Yusuf Pathan is still many miles from reaching there, I believe he has the capability and, most importantly, ATTITUDE to be there. He can fill in that spot at 7, given that the “Prince” Yuvraj Singh at number 6 has done very little in test matches to support immense faith placed by his captain and selectors. About time to give the Prince a bit of competition..

Imagine this; after two years, Indian test batting order can read like so: Shewag/Gambhir (1 & 2); Badri Nath / Murli Vijay(3), Virat Kohli/Suresh Raina (4), Laxman (5), Dhoni (6) and Yusuf Pathan (7). While it won’t be easy to replace Tendulkar and Dravid, above players if given enough exposure can at least give a start to a new order.

Care to share your late cut on this?

Welcome

Welcome to my Blog. And a big thank you in advance for giving your time to “listen” to my views on anything under the sun, but mainly the game of cricket. Till now I have bored my friends with my emails; till now I have benifited from their tolerance. So folks, here am I with my Blog..I can not promise to be unpretentious or tolerant at all times. However being aware of my frailties, I promise to try my best. Good thing is, I can accept both these vices from others, including an occassional abuse of English language. What is there in a language any ways? Gujarati, Hindi, Marathi, Punjabi, Australian all are welcome here as long as I can understand. So go on, join in a robust conversation..